Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Compliance boss awarded €13,000 for unpaid wages

A financial services firm has been ordered to pay its former compliance chief €13,333 – his salary for a month – after finding the sum was docked “unlawfully” from his pay last year.
The employee said the pay had never been forthcoming despite his “repeated requests” for the money prior to the conclusion of his employment earlier this year.
Billie Stevens has been awarded the sum by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) on foot of a complaint under the Payment of Wages Act 1997 against AAO IE Services Limited.
Mr Stevens told the WRC that he accepted a job offer as head of compliance and money-laundering reporting officer at AAO IE Services Limited on an annual salary of €160,000 and started on 18 July 2023.
His case was that he was paid what he was owed for his work that July – but got no salary the following month.
“Despite repeated requests the sum of €13,333 gross remains outstanding,” Mr Stevens told the tribunal. He remained at the firm until August 2024, the tribunal heard, with the Payment of Wages Act complaints being lodged in November 2023.
The company’s chief executive, Danny Brewster, appeared at a hearing on 9 August this year. He accepted that money was owed to Mr Stevens but “could not state the amount”, adjudicator Christina Ryan noted.
Mr Brewster had contended that Mr Stevens named the wrong legal entity in his complaint to the tribunal – and had never been employed by AAO IE Services Ltd.
The adjudicator directed Mr Brewster to file submissions in writing ahead of a reconvened hearing on 13 September. The tribunal noted that Mr Stevens’ employment with the company ended on 31 August 2024, just short of a fortnight prior to the second scheduled hearing.
Ms Ryan recorded that there was no appearance “by or on behalf of the respondent” at the second hearing, nor any legal submissions.
Ms Ryan wrote in her decision that she was “satisfied as to the veracity of the employment relationship and find that the complainant has named the correct respondent”.
Mr Stevens was a “credible witness” who had supported his claim for the August 2023 salary payment with documentation, she added.
“I find that the respondent deducted this amount unlawfully and that the complainant is entitled to payment of compensation equivalent to one months’ salary,” she wrote, awarding Mr Stevens a gross payment of €13,333 in back pay.

en_USEnglish